newsimpactscreener logonewsimpactscreener
Insights
ArticlesTopicsQuotesThe ArenaFamous TradersCEOsResearch
Free services
Daily News BriefingMarket Screenings
PricingDocsBlogSign inSign up
newsimpactscreener logonewsimpactscreener
Insights
ArticlesTopicsQuotesThe ArenaFamous TradersCEOsResearch
Free services
Daily News BriefingMarket Screenings
PricingDocsBlogSign inSign up
newsimpactscreener— news connected to markets.
@newsimpactscrnr on X@newsimpactscreener on InstagramAboutBriefingsTermsPrivacy
newsimpactscreener logonewsimpactscreener
Insights
ArticlesTopicsQuotesThe ArenaFamous TradersCEOsResearch
Free services
Daily News BriefingMarket Screenings
PricingDocsBlogSign inSign up
For retail & self-directed investors

Catch market-moving news before it hits the crowd.

See what a share price already pays for — and what it refuses to pay for — before you take the other side. Free, no account. Plus two tools that bring the signals to you.

Free — no card requiredTelegram & email deliverySee how it works →

Start free in seconds — pick one, or all three

Narrative trading

No account

Open any ticker and read the story its price already tells: what the market is paying for, what it declines to pay for, and the one question that settles it.

Read a price narrativeStart with AAPL
or

Free market screenings

Curated screeners

Platform-run Stage 2 setups, breakouts and fundamentals. Subscribe once; results hit your inbox.

Set up screeningsDownload latest momentum picks (CSV)
or

Your own personal briefing

Daily PDF · pre-open

You choose the exact tickers and tags — we send a daily PDF of just their news, summaries and market impact, an hour before the open. Built around your watchlist, no one else’s.

Build my briefingDownload a sample (PDF)
AI chip demand surgeRate cut expectationsEnergy supply pressureChina EV competitionCloud hyperscaler capexReshoring manufacturingDefense spending outlookConsumer credit stressBiotech regulatory cycleDollar strength impactAI chip demand surgeRate cut expectationsEnergy supply pressureChina EV competitionCloud hyperscaler capex

See it first

Real output, before you sign up

A genuine sample of each free tool — the morning briefing PDF, the latest momentum screening, and a live price narrative. No account needed.

news-briefing-Jun 11, 2026.pdfDaily PDF

Sample briefing

Tap to view the PDF

Open full briefing →
Build my briefing

Narrative trading

Every price is a story the market already believes

A share price is a vote on a set of claims. Narrative trading is reading that vote before you take the other side — what the price already pays for, what it refuses to pay for, and the single question that settles the difference. We reconstruct it from every published analyst model on the name, the reported segments and a reverse-DCF. Free on 609 tickers, no account.

  1. 01

    Read what the price already pays for

    Anything widely reported is already in the number. Buying a story everyone has read is paying full price for old news.

  2. 02

    Find what it refuses to pay for

    The rejected models are the opportunity. They name the specific upside — and downside — the market is currently declining to fund.

  3. 03

    Trade the one claim that settles it

    Most disagreements come down to a single variable. Know which one, and you know exactly which headline to act on and which to ignore.

AA

AAPL

20 published analyst models · as of 2026-08-31

Worked example

Where the price sits

How it works

Three steps, no terminal

  1. 01

    Follow the themes heating up

    Track narratives as they build—AI infrastructure, rate expectations, energy policy—before they become headlines everywhere.

  2. 02

    See which stocks and sectors are most exposed

    Get a clear picture of which companies sit closest to a story so you know where to look, not just what happened.

  3. 03

    Narrow ideas that match how you invest

    Filter by the factors you care about—growth, value, sector, risk—and keep your process consistent without manual spreadsheets.

Why it works

Built for how retail investors actually research

You don't need a desk full of monitors. Follow themes, see exposure, and narrow ideas—before the market has already moved.

Get signals before everyone else does

Cut through endless headlines. See which stories and themes are gaining traction so you know what to read first—without a terminal or a research team.

Link headlines to the stocks you already own

Turn "what's everyone talking about?" into "what might affect the names in my brokerage or IRA?"—before the connection is obvious everywhere else.

A steadier process. Fewer rabbit holes.

Whether you check in daily or on weekends, less doom-scrolling, fewer "what did I miss?" moments, and a shorter path from headline to decision.

What you get

Signal, not noise

Themes, not just tickers

Watch how narratives build over time so you're not reacting to every headline in isolation—or missing the ones that actually matter.

Exposure, in plain terms

Get a clear picture of which companies and industries sit closest to a story—before the market has priced it in.

Screen the way you think

Focus on the factors that matter to you—growth, value, risk, sectors—and keep your process consistent without spreadsheets you maintain by hand.

Free market screenings

Curated screenings, free to subscribe

Platform-managed screenings — Stage 2 setups, technicals, fundamentals — run on a schedule. Subscribe once and the results land in your inbox and Telegram, no setup required.

relationship-graphAt 07:00 AM, only on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday (Europe/Copenhagen)

Second-Order Chain

When a big story hits one company, the company economically attached to it often has not reacted yet. This board reads the platform's 38,000-edge relationship graph — typed, directional, evidence-backed supplier / customer / partner / competitor links extracted from news — and finds those un-reacted neighbours. The hard part is not finding connections; it is the three ways this strategy loses, each of which is a filter here rather than a judgement call: 1. THE NEIGHBOUR HAS ALREADY MOVED. This is a PRICE question, not a news question — sympathy selling moves a stock without generating a single article, so quiet coverage proves nothing. Each candidate's return over the window is compared with the headline's, and anything that has already collected a meaningful share of the move (in either direction) is dropped. 2. THE SIGN IS BACKWARDS. Edge direction in the graph is unambiguous — `from -[supplier]-> to` means from SUPPLIES to — so the rule is arithmetic: everyone in a value chain moves WITH the headline, a competitor moves AGAINST it. 3. THE EDGE IS TOO SMALL TO MATTER. A real relationship touching 2% of revenue is a fact, not a trade. Edges are gated on strength and on how many independent articles asserted them. Pipeline: 1. Headline names: enough coverage in the last few days to be a real story, and either a strongly one-directional sentiment reading or a large price move. Both are reported, because they disagree more often than you would expect — one recent story ran at +0.31 average sentiment across 75 articles while the stock fell 15%, and a sentiment-only screen would have pointed the wrong way. 2. Neighbours: every graph edge above a strength and mention floor, deduplicated to ONE edge per pair (the graph stores both directions and sometimes several types for the same pair). 3. Tradeable: US-listed and liquid enough to enter and exit; the raw graph contains foreign listings that no order could fill. 4. Sign, then the not-yet-moved test. 5. Contradictions dropped: a name that two live stories push in OPPOSITE directions is removed rather than resolved, because it has no second-order edge left. Several stories pushing the same way are kept as corroboration. Each row carries the headline and its move, the neighbour and its move, the share of the move already captured, the edge type / strength / evidence count, and the resulting side.

Straight answers

Common questions

Who it's for

Retail and self-directed investors who manage their own accounts—taxable brokerage, IRA, or both—and want news tied to opportunities, not noise.

How it's different

Most screeners start with static filters. News Impact Screener starts with what's happening in the world and shows what it might push on in the market—so you're not the last to know.

Why it helps

What would it mean to catch major news before everyone else? Less scrambling, fewer "I should have seen that coming" moments, and a watchlist you actually understand.

Early access

Not ready to be the last to know?

It seems like you want fast, reliable insight—without digging through hours of news. Join the list and get signals before the market reacts. Built for people who invest their own money and want context, not chaos.

Free. No spam. Takes 30 seconds.

Reshoring manufacturing
Defense spending outlook
Consumer credit stress
Biotech regulatory cycle
Dollar strength impact
PDF
nis-momentum-2026-10-09.csvLive screen
SymbolSectorSub SectorRS Rank
WSTHealthcareMedical - Instrum…86
AAPLTechnologyConsumer Electron…87
BOWFinancial ServicesInsurance - Prope…87
IEXIndustrialsIndustrial - Mach…87
METFinancial ServicesInsurance - Life87
TSMTechnologySemiconductors87
APHTechnologyHardware, Equipme…88
EQHFinancial ServicesAsset Management88
Open screening →
Set up screeningsCSV
aapl-narrative-2026-08-31Live read
AA

AAPL

20 published analyst models

$245median $360$400$320 today

The market is 11% below the median target — more cautious than the analysts.

Agree with the price
3
within 8%
Say it's too cheap
4
15%+ higher
Say it's too dear
4
15%+ lower
Read the narrative →
Browse narratives609 tickers
$245median $360$400$320 today

The market is 11% below the median target — more cautious than the analysts.

Agree with the price
3
within 8%
Say it's too cheap
4
15%+ higher
Say it's too dear
4
15%+ lower

The price sits at the 25th percentile of the 20 published models, leaning bearish versus the median $360 target, and requires revenue growth of 17.3% annually—far above the 6.4% just delivered—meaning the market is already paying for significant acceleration.

The price pays for

  • Stable iPhone and Services revenue at current growth rates (4.2% and 13.5% YoY), which are endorsed by the near-consensus models clustered 8-15% above the price.
  • Sustained high profitability, with the price assuming a 23.7% free cash flow margin continues indefinitely.
  • Ongoing component cost pressures and supply constraints, which are widely circulated and explicitly factored into the bear-case models the price rejects.

The price refuses to pay for

  • The full bull-case AI and services monetization upside, which the four rejected models at $375-$400 value at up to 25% above the current price.
  • The bear-case margin compression and growth stall, which the four rejected models at $245-$264 argue could remove 18-23% from the current price.

What the disagreement turns on

Whether Apple can accelerate its revenue growth to the 17%+ the price requires, primarily through AI-driven upgrades and Chinese market expansion, which can only be partially settled by tracking consumer attention and unit volumes.

Read AAPL’s full narrative

Written by a language model from the published models, the reported segments and a reverse-DCF — not a recommendation, and not a house view.

Also reconstructed and free to read

QSRFERGILMNAONPAATWQLYSAXSAPDMOHAPGEDRIDTECIFRIQVUSFDEVRPSAall 609 →
View screening →
fundamental-sentimentAt 07:00 AM, only on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday (Europe/Copenhagen)

Burry Deep Value

Michael Burry's documented method, run on both sides of the book. Half of it is a conventional value screen — EV/EBITDA (industry-relative, as Burry describes it), free cash flow, low debt, enterprise value rather than market cap. The other half is the part a conventional screener cannot run at all: Burry looked for "ick" stocks that provoke revulsion, and for the neglected — "unpopular companies that look like road kill". Those are facts about ATTENTION and SENTIMENT, and this platform measures both per ticker per day. Over a 90-day window across ~3,885 covered tickers, sentiment runs p10 -0.28 / median +0.41 / p90 +0.80. It skews strongly positive, so a negative reading is genuinely rare — which is what makes "ick" a discriminating gate rather than a mood. Pipeline (cheap gates first; the fundamental step costs one API call per survivor): 1. Attention gates, one query. LONG — 90-day average sentiment below zero AND mention count inside a neglect band (enough coverage to be real, little enough to be ignored). SHORT — sentiment above +0.60 AND heavily covered. 2. Liquidity floor: enough price and volume to take and exit a position. 3. Value gates, per survivor: LONG — EV/EBITDA under a SECTOR-relative ceiling (tech 18x … energy 8x), free cash flow yield above 4%, net debt / EBITDA under 3.5x. SHORT — EV/EBITDA above 1.5x the sector ceiling AND free cash flow yield under 2%: rich on the multiple and not generating the cash to justify it. A rich multiple on strong cash flow is a good business, not a short. 4. Rare-bird flag (not a gate): working capital per share above the price — Burry's "selling at less than two-thirds of net value". Flagged when found, because those deserve longer holding periods. 5. Margin of safety, where available: the priced-in programme's reverse-DCF. median_gap says where the price sits against published analyst models; implied_revenue_cagr says what growth the price REQUIRES. Only ~476 names carry one, so it annotates rather than gates — requiring it would cap the board at the large-cap end and exclude exactly the neglected names the screen exists to find. NO market-regime gate, unlike NIS Short. Gating on the S&P's 200-day is O'Neil's timing discipline; Burry is early on purpose and holds through the drawdown. This is deliberately NOT the NIS Short method. That board shorts former leaders in a Stage-4 breakdown, entered 5-15 weeks after the top. This one shorts what is expensive, adored and crowded while it is still going up. Known gap: short interest / days-to-cover is not available, so squeeze risk on the short side is unscreened — the same hole NIS Short documents. Rows carry a `side` field so one run answers both questions.

View screening →
ThematicAt 07:00 AM, only on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday (America/New_York)

Inflation Winners

Stocks positioned to benefit from persistently high inflation and higher-for-longer rates — precious metals, energy, commodities & materials, pricing-power staples, energy infrastructure, rate-beneficiary financials and inflation-protected proxies — each validated by price momentum and real inflation-news exposure.

View screening →
Browse all market screenings →

Instagram

Markets, in your feed

Daily regime reads, top-story breakdowns, and watchlist setups — the screener's signal, in 30 seconds a day.

Follow @newsimpactscreener
16 analysts publish a price target on Tesla ($TSLA). The share price sits below every one of them.

They range from $370 to $500. The median is $446. At $350.25 the stock is 22% below it — and 5% under even the lowest model. No published model sits below the price.

WHAT THE PRICE ALREADY PAYS FOR
✓ A shrinking car business: 73% of revenue, down 9.8% a year
✓ Energy Generation & Storage growing 26.6% a year
✓ Services and Other growing 18.9% a year
✓ Modest, incremental autonomy gains — not a paradigm shift

WHAT IT REFUSES TO PAY FOR
✕ A wide-scale robotaxi fleet by 2027 — worth up to 43% above the price, the $500 top model
✕ FSD v15 validated and released in late 2026 — the unlock the bull cases depend on
✕ Free-cash-flow margin jumping from 6.6% to software-platform levels

THE ONE QUESTION
Does FSD v15 trigger a wide-scale, high-margin robotaxi fleet by 2027? Nothing measurable settles it yet: the remote-assistance intervention rates that would can't be tracked with the data available.

That's the whole reading. Nothing held back.
569 US companies, rebuilt nightly — Tesla's is at newsimpactscreener.com/quote/TSLA (link in bio).

Reconstructed 25 Aug 2026 from 16 published analyst models. Not financial advice — a reading of what the price contains is not a forecast of where it goes.

16 analysts publish a price target on Tesla ($TSLA). The share price sits below every one of them. They range from $370 to $500. The median is $446. At $350.25 the stock is 22% below it — and 5% under even the lowest model. No published model sits below the price. WHAT THE PRICE ALREADY PAYS FOR ✓ A shrinking car business: 73% of revenue, down 9.8% a year ✓ Energy Generation & Storage growing 26.6% a year ✓ Services and Other growing 18.9% a year ✓ Modest, incremental autonomy gains — not a paradigm shift WHAT IT REFUSES TO PAY FOR ✕ A wide-scale robotaxi fleet by 2027 — worth up to 43% above the price, the $500 top model ✕ FSD v15 validated and released in late 2026 — the unlock the bull cases depend on ✕ Free-cash-flow margin jumping from 6.6% to software-platform levels THE ONE QUESTION Does FSD v15 trigger a wide-scale, high-margin robotaxi fleet by 2027? Nothing measurable settles it yet: the remote-assistance intervention rates that would can't be tracked with the data available. That's the whole reading. Nothing held back. 569 US companies, rebuilt nightly — Tesla's is at newsimpactscreener.com/quote/TSLA (link in bio). Reconstructed 25 Aug 2026 from 16 published analyst models. Not financial advice — a reading of what the price contains is not a forecast of where it goes.

View
20 analysts publish a price target on Apple ($AAPL). The share price agrees with 3 of them — and refuses to pay for 8.

They range from $245 to $400. The median is $360. At $319.70 the stock sits 11% below it.

WHAT THE PRICE ALREADY PAYS FOR
✓ iPhone and Services growing at today's pace: 4.2% and 13.5% a year
✓ A 23.7% free-cash-flow margin, held indefinitely
✓ Component cost pressure and supply constraints
✓ Tim Cook's departure — public, and already absorbed

WHAT IT REFUSES TO PAY FOR
✕ The full AI + Services monetization bull case — the four $375–$400 models, up to 25% above the price
✕ Margin compression and a growth stall — the four $245–$264 models, 18–23% below

THE ONE QUESTION
Can Apple accelerate revenue growth to the 17%+ the price requires — against 6.4% just delivered — through AI-driven upgrades and China? Partly measurable: unit volumes and attention can be tracked; the rest can't yet.

That's the whole reading. Nothing held back.
569 US companies, rebuilt nightly — Apple's is at newsimpactscreener.com/quote/AAPL (link in bio).

Reconstructed 31 Aug 2026 from 20 published analyst models. Not financial advice — a reading of what the price contains is not a forecast of where it goes.21 analysts publish a price target on Microsoft ($MSFT). The share price agrees with 12 of them — and refuses to pay for 7.

They range from $400 to $690. The median is $525. At $501.02 the stock sits 5% below it.

WHAT THE PRICE ALREADY PAYS FOR
✓ Azure past $100B, growing ~43% a year
✓ The $678B commercial backlog, read as confirming today's trajectory, not beating it
✓ Revenue growth near 18%, operating margin near 47%
✓ Cloud demand accelerating across every hyperscaler

WHAT IT REFUSES TO PAY FOR
✕ Copilot + Azure AI pushing growth high enough for a 28–38% premium — the bull models up to $690
✕ AI capex swamping free cash flow and squeezing margins — the $400 bear model, ~20% down
✕ Google Cloud's 82% growth taking real share from Azure

THE ONE QUESTION
Does the AI backlog turn into free cash flow at a 20%+ margin — or does the capex needed to deliver it erode that margin and break the 19.6% revenue growth the price requires? Revenue conversion can be tracked; the margin pressure can't yet.

That's the whole reading. Nothing held back.
569 US companies, rebuilt nightly — Microsoft's is at newsimpactscreener.com/quote/MSFT (link in bio).

Reconstructed 1 Sep 2026 from 21 published analyst models. Not financial advice — a reading of what the price contains is not a forecast of where it goes.33 analysts publish a price target on Amazon. The share price sits below every one of them.

$251.89 against a $328 median. Which side are you on?

→ BUY if you believe AWS holds 19.7% growth and margins widen. Median of 33 models: $328, +30%.
→ SELL if you believe free cash flow stays stuck near 1.1% of revenue. No published model sits below the price — the lowest is $305.

WHAT THE PRICE ALREADY PAYS FOR
✓ $716.92B revenue and the 12.4% growth just delivered
✓ An 11.2% operating margin, 50.3% gross
✓ $7.7B in free cash flow — about 1.1% of revenue
✓ Macro headwinds: Strait of Hormuz disruption, high rates

WHAT IT REFUSES TO PAY FOR
✕ AWS holding 19.7% growth with expanding margins — the case for $305+
✕ Advertising holding 22.1% growth despite the FTC lawsuit
✕ A free cash flow margin climbing from 1.1% toward the mid-teens
✕ $700B+ of hyperscaler AI capex turning into AWS contract wins

THE QUESTION: can AWS and Advertising accelerate enough to lift the FCF margin toward the mid-teens? Partly measurable: attention and unit volumes show early; the margin only when Amazon reports.

The whole reading, nothing held back. 547 US companies, rebuilt nightly: newsimpactscreener.com/quote/AMZN (link in bio).

Reconstructed 10 Sep 2026 at $251.89 from 33 published models. Other people's targets, not our forecast. Not financial advice.18 analysts publish a price target on Alphabet. The share price sits below every one of them.

$337.12 against a $422 median. Which side are you on, according to the analysts?

→ BUY if you believe Google Cloud grows 40%+ a year. Median of 18 models: $422, +25%.
→ SELL if you believe Cloud holds ~36% and margins stay flat. Careful — no published model sits below the price at all.

WHAT THE PRICE ALREADY PAYS FOR
✓ Search growing near its 13.4% pace
✓ The DOJ ad-tech remedy — largely dismissed after the court rejected a forced AdX sale
✓ A 4.8% 10-year yield and macro risk
✓ Cloud at ~35.8% growth, no acceleration
✓ An 18.2% FCF margin, held flat

WHAT IT REFUSES TO PAY FOR
✕ Cloud sustaining 40%+ — what the $422 median is built on
✕ AI lifting search margins above 18.2%
✕ A re-rating if rates fall or geopolitics ease
✕ Any value for Waymo or Other Bets

THE QUESTION: does Cloud hold 35%+ and does AI expand search margins? Partly measurable — Cloud's growth prints every quarter; the margin half, nothing we have wired can settle.

That's the whole reading, nothing held back. Rebuilt nightly for 546 US companies: newsimpactscreener.com/quote/GOOGL (link in bio).

Reconstructed 2 Sep 2026 at $337.12 from 18 published models. Those are other people's targets, not our forecast. Not financial advice.

20 analysts publish a price target on Apple ($AAPL). The share price agrees with 3 of them — and refuses to pay for 8. They range from $245 to $400. The median is $360. At $319.70 the stock sits 11% below it. WHAT THE PRICE ALREADY PAYS FOR ✓ iPhone and Services growing at today's pace: 4.2% and 13.5% a year ✓ A 23.7% free-cash-flow margin, held indefinitely ✓ Component cost pressure and supply constraints ✓ Tim Cook's departure — public, and already absorbed WHAT IT REFUSES TO PAY FOR ✕ The full AI + Services monetization bull case — the four $375–$400 models, up to 25% above the price ✕ Margin compression and a growth stall — the four $245–$264 models, 18–23% below THE ONE QUESTION Can Apple accelerate revenue growth to the 17%+ the price requires — against 6.4% just delivered — through AI-driven upgrades and China? Partly measurable: unit volumes and attention can be tracked; the rest can't yet. That's the whole reading. Nothing held back. 569 US companies, rebuilt nightly — Apple's is at newsimpactscreener.com/quote/AAPL (link in bio). Reconstructed 31 Aug 2026 from 20 published analyst models. Not financial advice — a reading of what the price contains is not a forecast of where it goes.

View

21 analysts publish a price target on Microsoft ($MSFT). The share price agrees with 12 of them — and refuses to pay for 7. They range from $400 to $690. The median is $525. At $501.02 the stock sits 5% below it. WHAT THE PRICE ALREADY PAYS FOR ✓ Azure past $100B, growing ~43% a year ✓ The $678B commercial backlog, read as confirming today's trajectory, not beating it ✓ Revenue growth near 18%, operating margin near 47% ✓ Cloud demand accelerating across every hyperscaler WHAT IT REFUSES TO PAY FOR ✕ Copilot + Azure AI pushing growth high enough for a 28–38% premium — the bull models up to $690 ✕ AI capex swamping free cash flow and squeezing margins — the $400 bear model, ~20% down ✕ Google Cloud's 82% growth taking real share from Azure THE ONE QUESTION Does the AI backlog turn into free cash flow at a 20%+ margin — or does the capex needed to deliver it erode that margin and break the 19.6% revenue growth the price requires? Revenue conversion can be tracked; the margin pressure can't yet. That's the whole reading. Nothing held back. 569 US companies, rebuilt nightly — Microsoft's is at newsimpactscreener.com/quote/MSFT (link in bio). Reconstructed 1 Sep 2026 from 21 published analyst models. Not financial advice — a reading of what the price contains is not a forecast of where it goes.

View

33 analysts publish a price target on Amazon. The share price sits below every one of them. $251.89 against a $328 median. Which side are you on? → BUY if you believe AWS holds 19.7% growth and margins widen. Median of 33 models: $328, +30%. → SELL if you believe free cash flow stays stuck near 1.1% of revenue. No published model sits below the price — the lowest is $305. WHAT THE PRICE ALREADY PAYS FOR ✓ $716.92B revenue and the 12.4% growth just delivered ✓ An 11.2% operating margin, 50.3% gross ✓ $7.7B in free cash flow — about 1.1% of revenue ✓ Macro headwinds: Strait of Hormuz disruption, high rates WHAT IT REFUSES TO PAY FOR ✕ AWS holding 19.7% growth with expanding margins — the case for $305+ ✕ Advertising holding 22.1% growth despite the FTC lawsuit ✕ A free cash flow margin climbing from 1.1% toward the mid-teens ✕ $700B+ of hyperscaler AI capex turning into AWS contract wins THE QUESTION: can AWS and Advertising accelerate enough to lift the FCF margin toward the mid-teens? Partly measurable: attention and unit volumes show early; the margin only when Amazon reports. The whole reading, nothing held back. 547 US companies, rebuilt nightly: newsimpactscreener.com/quote/AMZN (link in bio). Reconstructed 10 Sep 2026 at $251.89 from 33 published models. Other people's targets, not our forecast. Not financial advice.

View

18 analysts publish a price target on Alphabet. The share price sits below every one of them. $337.12 against a $422 median. Which side are you on, according to the analysts? → BUY if you believe Google Cloud grows 40%+ a year. Median of 18 models: $422, +25%. → SELL if you believe Cloud holds ~36% and margins stay flat. Careful — no published model sits below the price at all. WHAT THE PRICE ALREADY PAYS FOR ✓ Search growing near its 13.4% pace ✓ The DOJ ad-tech remedy — largely dismissed after the court rejected a forced AdX sale ✓ A 4.8% 10-year yield and macro risk ✓ Cloud at ~35.8% growth, no acceleration ✓ An 18.2% FCF margin, held flat WHAT IT REFUSES TO PAY FOR ✕ Cloud sustaining 40%+ — what the $422 median is built on ✕ AI lifting search margins above 18.2% ✕ A re-rating if rates fall or geopolitics ease ✕ Any value for Waymo or Other Bets THE QUESTION: does Cloud hold 35%+ and does AI expand search margins? Partly measurable — Cloud's growth prints every quarter; the margin half, nothing we have wired can settle. That's the whole reading, nothing held back. Rebuilt nightly for 546 US companies: newsimpactscreener.com/quote/GOOGL (link in bio). Reconstructed 2 Sep 2026 at $337.12 from 18 published models. Those are other people's targets, not our forecast. Not financial advice.

View

Live experiment

Season 1 · running

Nine AI agents. $100,000 each. One market.

  1. Leader
    Barren Wuffett

    Ignores the news. Buys businesses on the numbers.

    +10.97%

    $110,971·-5.8% DD

    1
  2. Second
    Mark Minervine

    Trades the platform's own screening boards, and nothing else.

    +6.31%

    $106,308·-4.3% DD

    2
  3. Third
    Jack Boggle

    Bought SPY on day one. Has done nothing since.

    +3.97%

    $103,973·-3.3% DD

    control · no LLM
    3
See the full leaderboard and every trade →

Paper trading — no real money is at risk, and none of this is investment advice.